← Back

Past Tenses & Future

Preteritum, perfekt, pluskvamperfekt and the future with kommer att / ska
Svenskan som tempus-framträdande system
Swedish tense system as tense-prominent (unlike Greek's aspect)
-
Tense, not aspect, is the primary organizing verbal category
Diakron utveckling av starka/svaga verbklasser
Diachronic development of strong/weak verb classes
from Proto-Germanic ablaut
A shared inheritance across the whole Germanic language family
Grammatikalisering av ska/kommer att som framtidsmarkörer
Grammaticalization of ska/kommer att as future markers
-
Both trace back to verbs of obligation/motion, not pure tense marking
Supinum vs perfekt particip: morfologisk teori
The supine vs perfect participle distinction: morphological theory
-
A subtle but grammatically important distinction in Swedish
-s-passiv vs bli-passiv: semantiska/syntaktiska skillnader
-s passive vs bli-passive: semantic and syntactic differences
-
Two passive strategies with distinct nuances of meaning
Tempusföljdsfenomen och syntaktiska begränsningar
Sequence-of-tense phenomena and their syntactic constraints
-
Formal rules governing how tenses combine across clauses
Komparativa skandinaviska tempus-/aspektsystem
Comparative Scandinavian tense/aspect systems
Swedish vs Norwegian vs Danish
Closely related but not identical verbal systems
Korpusbaserad frekvens av preteritum vs perfekt
Corpus-based frequency of preteritum vs perfect in narrative registers
-
Data-driven insight into how these tenses are actually used
Beräkningsmässig tempusklassificering för svensk NLP
Computational tense classification for Swedish NLP systems
-
Automated systems must distinguish these overlapping tense forms
Dialektal variation i starka verbs preteritumformer
Dialectal variation in strong verb preteritum forms
-
Some regional dialects preserve older or divergent vowel patterns